![](../catalog/twelveangry/twelveangry.jacket2.gif)
USA drama
1956
bw 92 min.
Director: Sidney Lumet
CLV: out-of-print collectible
           1 disc, catalog # CC1127L
12 Angry Men is an unflinching, close-up study of a jury
entrusted with the power over life and death. Twelve men, locked in a
room on the hottest day of the year, must decide the fate of a boy
charged with knifing his father to death. A verdict of guilty would
mean a mandatory death sentence. The decision must be unanimous.
The film explores the process of law in human hands, where
prejudice, fear, weakness, and even weather can divert the carriage of
justice. In the stifling confines of the jury room, one juror stands
alone with a reasonable doubt. An architect, patient and concerned, he
feels compelled to explore the foundations of the case. As he calls
for exhibits and rehashes the testimony with a gentle persistence, the
other jurors--previously confident of the boy's guilt--begin to sway
and consider the impact they may have upon a human life.
The 95-minute running time of the film is also the duration of the
jurors' decision-making. The camera, like the jurors, cannot leave
the room until a verdict has been reached. Faithful to Aristotle's
prescription for classical theater, 12 Angry Men observes the
unities of time, place, and action, which is rare in a film.
Sidney Lumet, in his debut as a film director, used the techniques
of the theater to evoke the claustrophobic tension of the jury
room. Before shooting, he rehearsed his cast for two weeks, running
through the script like a play. With the aid of On the
Waterfront cinematographer Boris Kaufman, Lumet plotted the
camera's movements to highlight what developed during the intensive
period of rehearsal.
Lumet's cast was utterly at ease with his methods; all were
experienced theater actors. Generally known as one of the handful of
television-trained directors who turned to film in the fifties.
Lumet, in fact, has a far longer history with the theater. He made his
stage debut in 1928 at the age of four, while his father performed in
the Yiddish Theater in New York City. He appeared regularly on
Broadway from 1935 until 1948, when he began to direct.
Lumet's theatrical background may be why Henry Fonda chose him to
direct his picture. Fonda often expressed a preference for theater as
an actor's medium. Actors choosing directors is a rare occurrence in
Hollywood, but Fonda exercised an unusual control over the making of
12 Angry Men. Not only was he its single box office star, he
also co-produced with screenwriter Reginald Rose. Rose's teleplay of
12 Angry Men had been extremely successful on CBS's Studio One
and United Artists offered the film project to Fonda. According to his
autobiography, Fonda: My Life, the woes of production did not
agree with him. He felt bogged down in the minor concerns he had been
able to ignore as an actor and was particularly frustrated with the
city-scene backdrop which hung outside the jury room window. Although
Lumet and Kaufman assured him that the scrim would be convincing once
properly lit, Fonda complained because it did not seem as life-like as
the backdrops Hitchcock used when filming The Wrong Man earlier
in the same year. Nonetheless, Fonda's productorial effort was
successful. After only 17 days of shooting, Fonda and Rose finished
the film for only $340,000Ņone thousand dollars under budget.
Reviewers at the film's opening were virtually unanimous in their
praise. Variety cited the "outstanding performances" and
"exciting screenplay," predicting "good, if not socko, returns" at the
box office. The more subdued New York Times called it a "taut,
absorbing and compelling drama . . . powerful and provocative enough
to keep a viewer spellbound." Even Eleanor Roosevelt applauded: "As a
character study, this is a fascinating movie, but more than that, it
points up the fact which too many of us have not taken seriously, of
what it means to serve on a jury when a man's life is at stake. In
addition, it makes vivid what 'reasonable doubt' means when a murder
trial jury makes up its mind on circumstantial evidence."
Despite the critics' praise, 12 Angry Men was not a
financial success. United Artists opened the picture at Loew's
Flagship in New York, a cavernous 4,600 seat theater. The film drew
only enough audience to fill the first few rows, and United Artists
pulled it after one week. Even with its miniscule budget, 12 Angry
Men failed to turn a profit or even pay Fonda his deferred salary.
The film continued to win accolades, however, including an Academy
Award nomination for Best Picture, a First Prize at the Berlin Film
Festival and other prizes in Scandinavia, Italy, and Japan. Sidney
Lumet won an Academy Award nomination for his first directorial effort
and launched a prodigious career which has included Long Day's
Journey into Night (1962), Dog Day Afternoon (1975), and
The Verdict (1982). Reginald Rose received, in addition to his
Academy Award nomination for Best Screenplay, a Writer's Guild of
America Award, the Edgar Allan Poe Award from the Mystery Writers of
America, and a citation at the Berlin Film Festival.
Although
moviegoers in 1957 failed to support it, 12 Angry Men has
gradually gained recognition as an American classic. Business and law
schools continue to use it as a perfect demonstration of effective
persuasion, and as a study of living justice with all its flaws and
contingencies it remains unsurpassed. But above all, 12 Angry
Men has attained its stature through its quietly compelling
exploration of twelve average men cooped up in a hot room with a
problem of life and death.
-- PETER HEATH BECKER
CREDITS
Director: Sidney Lumet
Producers: Henry Fonda, Reginald Rose
Story and Screenplay: Reginald Rose
Associate Producer: George Justin
Music: Kenyon Hopkins
Art Director: Robert Merkel
Film Editor: Carl Lerner
Assistant Director: Donald Kranze
Make-up: Herman Buchman
Sound: Faith Elliot
Operative Cameraman: Saul Midwall
TRANSFER
This edition of 12 Angry Men was made from a 35mm fine grain
master print.