Paul Morrissey's two schlock entertainments, Flesh for Frankenstein and Blood for Dracula, were shot in seven weeks in 1973. They have become cult classics for their camp spirit and gross humor. But there is more to both films than meets the funnybone.

They have much in common with Morrissey's more characteristic films, the Flesh trilogy of 1968-72 and his New York street sagas, Mixed Blood (1974) and Spike of Bensonhurst (1988). The central figures fail to achieve a full self or life because they have too much freedom and power. Sensual self-indulgence seems the characters' worst flaw and sexual exploitation the typical human relationship. Morrissey's period pieces (including Beethoven's Nephew, 1985) depict the historical roots of the amorality and commodification that Morrissey reflects in his contemporary dramas. So while these films are hearty comedies, they confirm Morrissey's passionate critique of modern permissiveness.

A shortage of Romanian virgins drives the vampire Count Dracula (Udo Kier) and his faithful servant Anton (Arno Juerging) to Italy. There an aristocratic family is pleased to provide a bride from among their daughters. But the count chokes on the blood of the nonvirgins. The family handyman, Mario (Joe Dallesandro) rapes the 14-year-old daughter, ostensibly to save her from the vampire. After the climactic carnage, this peasant commands the estate.

Morrissey obviously has a lark with the vampire film conventions. He seems to be both in and outside the genre, performing and satirizing it at the same time. So no explanation is given for why the second-generation Italian peasant Mario speaks New York colloquiall; a modern character simply forced onto the period. His Marxist cliches also satirize the political pretensions of the European art cinema. In contrast to Anton's selfless service to the count, Mario's seduction of three of his master's four daughters replaces the higher values of legend with the vices of social reality.

In the same spirit of being both in- and outside the genre, Morrissey casts two established film directors in significant roles. The master of Italian neorealism, Vittorio de Sica, plays the Marquis Di Fiori and Roman Polanski, a specialist of psychological horror, plays the peasant who bests Anton in a tavern game. This star casting invites a comparison between the two figures, the impotent, vain aristocrat and the potent, pragmatic peasant.

The marquis also relates to the count as a romantic striving to sustain traditional values against a corrupt modernity. The count assumes more dignity and pathos from this comparison. Indeed, he becomes a genuinely moving figure when he's tricked into taking nonvirgin blood. His toilet agonies are laughable but we are touched when we remember that they are the death throes of a dashing figure who canŐt survive in a world without purity. In this corrupt world, sex means death to the romantic hero.

Mario's Marxism may seem persuasive, but it's revealed as but another form of oppression. In front of his hammer and sickle insignia, Mario brutalizes his women. When he supplants Di Fiori and dispatches Dracula, Mario represents not the triumph of the people but the replacement of one tyranny with another, less dignified. On another level, Dallesandro's succession of de Sica represents the ascent of Morrissey's New York neorealism over de Sica's.

Blood for Dracula is not a film for the squeamish. It has obvious appeal for the lover of Grand Guignol-but it equally addresses the thoughtful.

Maurice Yacowar
Maurice Yacowar is Dean of the Faculty of Fine Arts at the University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and the author of The Films of Paul Morrissey (Cambridge University Press).