USA science fiction
1956
bw 80 min.
Director: Don Siegel
CLV: $44.95 - available
           1 disc, catalog # CC1174L
Don
Siegel's Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) is one cult film that has
also won over the cultivated buff. As Peter Morris remarks (in his Dictionary
of Films): "Though one of the subtlest films of the genre, containing little
graphic horror, it is also one of the most passionate and involving." Jean-Luc
Godard quotes the film in his futuristic Alphaville. So does Fran¨ois
Truffaut in Fahrenheit 451. Even Eugene Ionesco, the brilliant playwright,
may have had Don Siegel's pods in mind when he wrote his Absurdist masterpiece
Rhinoceros. There, humankind turns into thick-skinned, insensitive,
conformist rhinos -- pods on the hoof.In any case, the film stands on its own
30 years after its modest release. Indeed, for its pacing and complexity many
people still prefer it over the more opulent 1978 version by Philip Kaufman. The
original began as just one of those "B" films that in the '50s lured us to the
drive-ins for chills and thrills. But its stark effects and serious concerns made
it a cult favorite, first in Europe, then in North America. For years it was one
of the most requested films on television, and a film society standby. Even today
it seems a unique combination of the nightmare world of horror movies, the
prophecy of sci-fi and the shadowy, webbed paranoia of film noir. This
Invasion crosses all sorts of lines, including the one that separates pop
entertainment from high art.
The giant pods that sprout those cold, sinister
clones have received all kinds of interpretation. For some, the fear of these
unemotional creatures expressed America's fear of communist infiltration in the
early '50s, especially as typified by Senator Joseph McCarthy. For others, the
pod creatures themselves represent a society terrified of a minority idea or a
new freedom. The film's themes of the threat to the individual's will and the
dangerous pressure to conform speak to people on any point of the political
spectrum.
The film may have seemed more topical in the early '50s, when the
papers were full of stories about brainwashing in the Korean War and suspicions
of Red subversion in North America. J. Edgar Hoover articulated this fear in his
book Masters of Deceit: The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight
It (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1958, p. 9): "Remember, always, that there
are thousands of people in this country now working in secret to make it happen
here." Clearly the film touched a naked nerve. In addition to such obvious cases
as I Was a Communist for the FBI (1951) and My Son John (1952),
this political context colored the whole cycle of Alien Invader films.
The
nerve is still naked. It's a matter of not just politics but of nightmare. The
film evokes the terror we may all have felt when we dreamt -- or experienced -- a
loved one suddenly turning cold and unfeeling towards us. What makes this movie
so chilling is that the aliens here are not foreign creatures but our intimates,
our loved ones and most familiar friends. The film is so unsettling because it
depicts threat and psychological violence within the nuclear family. After all,
the '50s were also a period of "Togetherness," when happy family sitcoms ruled
TV-land. The film's locale of Santa Mira is just this kind of Americana -- and we
witness its exposure.
There is also the fear of becoming vegetable, here as in
The Thing (1950). In an older horror tradition, we dread succumbing to our
animal nature. Hence the werewolf and Frankenstein monster sagas and all Them
Other Beasts -- from 20,000 Fathoms, Outer Space, Beneath the Sea and Black
Lagoons. In the bland '50s this fear of unbridled animal energy was mirrored by
the opposite fear of turning into an unfeeling creature, such as a zombie or (in
this case) a vegetable. Like the vegetable in the Gray Flannel Suit. For the '50s
were also the age of Sloane Wilson's dissection of the corporate mentality and
David Reisman's The Lonely Crowd. In Invasion, Miles Bennell
becomes the alienated loner in the conformist society. Wherever people suppress
their emotions and their character differences, you have the kind of "pod"
society that threatens here.
In reaction against the '50s we began to want to
be non-conformists -- like everyone else. Our heroes reaffirm the validity of
holding one opinion when the whole world maintains the contrary. Dr. Bennell opts
for the life of love, madness, even pain, because to cut out those experiences is
to fail to be fully human. He rejects the pod psychiatrist's rationalization:
"There is no need for love or emotion. Love, ambition, desire, faith -- without
them life is so simple." So, let's hope, do we. After all, we're still children
of the '50s, quaking under the same shadow of The Bomb and the same fears of
humanity dwindling before mass technology and our heavy social pressures.
--
MAURICE YACOWAR
Credits
Producer: Walter Wanger
Director: Don
Siegel
Screenplay by: Daniel Mainwaring
From the Collier's magazine serial
"The Body Snatchers" by: Jack Finney
Cinematographer: Ellsworth Fredericks,
A.S.C.
Music: Carmen Dragon
Film Editor: Robert S. Eisen
Sound: Ralph
Butler
Sound Editor: Del Harris
Production Design: Edward
Haworth
Production Manager: Allen K. Wood
Assistant Directors: Bill
Beaudine, Jr., Richard Maybery
Music Editor: Jerry Irvin
Special Effects:
Milt Rice
Transfer
This edition of Invasion of the Body
Snatchers was transferred from a SuperScope negative, which retains the
movie's original widescreen aspect ratio.